When to Use "I Would" vs. "I Was Going To"
Moving beyond "textbook" English to natural fluency.
For many advanced English learners and IELTS aspirants, the struggle isn't knowing the grammar rules—it’s knowing when to use them to sound natural. You’ve mastered the present perfect, you handle conditionals with ease, and your vocabulary is expanding daily. Yet, when you speak or write, something feels… stiff. You sound like a textbook.
One of the most common culprits of this "robotic" English is the misuse of future-in-the-past constructions. Specifically, the confusion between "I would" and "I was going to."
The Grammar Breakdown: Future-in-the-Past
Both phrases describe a future event from the perspective of a point in the past. On the surface, they seem interchangeable. However, in conversation, they carry entirely different psychological weight and intent.
Example A:
"I knew I would finish the essay by midnight."
Example B:
"I was going to finish the essay by midnight."
Understanding this nuance is a hallmark of advanced proficiency. Mastering the difference allows you to express not just what you planned, but how you feel about that plan's outcome.
1. "I Was Going To": The Intention That Never Materialized
The phrase "I was going to" is the most common way native speakers describe a past intention that was interrupted, changed, or abandoned. It focuses on the plan you had, often implying that the plan didn't happen.
When to use it:
- Change of plan: "I was going to study for the IELTS exam tonight, but my friends convinced me to go out for dinner."
- Excuses/Explanations: "I was going to call you, but I forgot my phone at home."
- Unfulfilled actions: "I was going to finish that article, but the power went out."
The "Textbook" Trap
Learners often avoid this phrase because it feels informal, opting for "I intended to" instead. While grammatically perfect, it sounds cold and distant. If you want a Band 8 or 9 in IELTS Speaking, "I was going to" shows you can express spontaneous changes naturally.
2. "I Would": The Future Seen from the Past
"I would" is the past form of "will." When we use it for the future-in-the-past, we are looking at the outcome as a certainty or a predictable sequence.
When to use it:
- Promised outcomes: "He promised that he would help me with my grammar."
- Sequence of events: "I packed my bag, knowing I would leave for London the next morning."
- Past willingness: "They said they would participate in the debate."
Why it feels "Academic": Because it is the direct past of "will," it carries a sense of objectivity. It doesn't focus on the struggle or interruption—it focuses on eventuality. This is the neutral way to report past intentions.
The Crucial Difference: Intention vs. Prediction
To master this, think of it in terms of Agency versus Trajectory.
Agency (Intent)
"I was going to" emphasizes your personal choice and the specific fact that something intervened to prevent you from carrying out that choice.
Trajectory (Timeline)
"I would" emphasizes the timeline and the fact that the action was a natural, expected step in the narrative of the past.
The Comparison Table
How to Elevate Your Writing (IELTS Tips)
If you are preparing for the IELTS Writing Task 2, the choice between these two phrases can shift the entire tone of your essay.
Use "I would" for Academic Distance
When writing about past studies or historical predictions, "would" maintains objectivity.
Use "I was going to" for Emphasis
In persuasive pieces, use this to highlight a flawed argument or failed plan.
Practice: The "Natural Fluency" Exercise
Stop sounding like a textbook by replacing stiff expressions with natural alternatives:
Conclusion
Finding Your Voice
The transition from a student of English to a master of English is not about learning more rules—it is about learning which rules to break, and which phrases to choose for the right emotional impact.
"I was going to"
Gives you the power to explain your life, your errors, and your changes of mind with a natural cadence.
"I would"
Gives you the precision to report events and predictions with authority.
Stop memorizing charts. Start listening. You’ll soon realize that sounding like a native isn't about complexity; it’s about choosing the word that carries exactly the right amount of weight for the moment.
Return to Masterclass